Thursday, 6 December 2007

Do the Climate Faithful understand they're supporting Marxist policies?

It's axiomatic that belief in anthropogenic global warming is a completely political position, which is why when people like me actually demonstrate the non-science that supposedly supports the argument the Climate Faithful come back with all sorts of ad hominem attacks, unsupported, unscientific drivel and policy positions based on the wildly misanthropic precautionary principle.

I have posted on numerous occasions about one of the elephants in the room of the Climate Faithful being the take over of the environmental movement by those on the extreme political left. That's why Big Green members are referred to as watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside.

I sometimes wonder whether the politically naive, feel good, centre-left voter who supports environmental causes but for whom Marxist theology is anathema actually understand who's driving the old Climate Change Bus.

Here's Phil Valentine's latest article, supporting the same position:
U.N. scam shows Marxism at heart of warming movement

Apparently, I hit a nerve with a column I wrote a couple of weeks ago on global warming. Many of you took umbrage with my daring to connect the global warming movement to Marxism. Don't get me wrong. I do not believe everyone involved in the global warming movement subscribes to Karl Marx's philosophy. However, make no mistake about it. Those at the epicenter of this movement have ulterior motives, many of them socialist or even Marxist. What I wrote that caused such a fuss was that global warming is being used as a template to rob from the rich nations and give to the poor ones.

Right on cue, the United Nations issued a report last week that made my point. The headline from The Associated Press: "Poor will need $86b from rich to cope, UN says." Ah, here we go.

The report says the rich nations will need to cough up $86 billion per year by 2015 to "strengthen the capacity of vulnerable people." Half the money, ostensibly, would go toward "climate-proofing" developing nations' infrastructure, whatever that means, while the other half would help the poor cope with related risks. Of course, the ambiguity is on purpose. You and I know that the bulk of this money will be skimmed off by tinhorn dictators, the same rabble that runs the U.N.

The report was conveniently released just a week before the world's nations gather in Bali to hammer out yet another Kyoto-style climate treaty. This will be another attempt to shame the developed world into turning over their hard-earned gold and silver to the rest of the world.

"In Bali, we are going to very seriously discuss the price rich countries have to pay so that poorer countries can preserve their forests," said Brazil's leftist president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Ironically, Brazil is one of the world's biggest emitters of so-called greenhouse gases. They're mowing down the rain forest to beat the band, and now they and the United Nations want us to pay them to stop destroying it. Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

The Bali bailout comes at a time when the Energy Information Administration reports that U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are actually down 1.5 percent. Don't count on that getting much press at the conference. We're also coming off a tame hurricane season, despite the loud rantings from the global-warming crowd that this would be one of the worst seasons on record. Al Gore said in September 2005, "Now, the scientific community is warning us that the average hurricane will continue to get stronger because of global warming." We're coming off two relatively tame hurricane seasons in a row. Where are all these stronger hurricanes Gore was warning about? Does that mean he's now willing to admit he was wrong? Probably not.

Actually, the only hurricane-force winds clocked in these parts came from the wake of Al Gore's automobile. According to a report by NewsChannel5, ole Spotted Al was clocked doing a not-so-fuel-efficient 95 mph last year. At least, he'll be able to speed in style. The Tennessean's own Beverly Keel reported that Mr. Gore was spotted purchasing a Lexus LS 600h, their new hybrid model. According to a New York Times review, Al's new ride gets a whopping 21 mpg — 1 mpg less than the non-hybrid version. Atta way to save the planet, Al. Maybe there's an opening for you at the U.N.
(Nothing Follows)


Anonymous said...

So Marxism is now defined simply as the wealthy giving to the poor is it?

Myrddin Seren said...


Are the modest, slightly leftish people jumping, for instance, on toThe Greens bandwagon to 'stop climate chaos' even aware anymore of the downsides of large, statist totalitarian socialist regimes ?

The Berlin Wall came down in 1989. There is a whole generation to whom the edifice of Stalinism is not even ancient history - they simply have never heard of it. North Korea seems to be viewed as almost a quaint walled theme park.

The call regularly goes up in pronouncements about global warming by well educated people for 'wartime emergency' powers to manage society's response and democracy and the markets are damned as failures and unable to address the situation.

And how much outcry do you hear other than from those with a strong sense of the battle against totalitarianism in the 20th century to these suggestions - nil.

People are overwhelmed with numerous and complex issues. One clear result of the Australian federal election is that time poor, stressed voters especially in the marginals wanted simple, box-tick solutions.

So brace yourself for the day some demagogue really rolls on this.

I particulary refer to Peter Cook's prescient satire - "The Rise and Rise of Michael Rimmer" (1970). Well worth a watch if it can be tracked down.