Wednesday 16 May 2007

ClimateAudit and the Climate Team's hypocrisy

Steve McIntyre's ClimateAudit is the place to go to read about the reality of major climate scientists' refusal to subject their findings to scrutiny by their critics.

In a recent post Swindle and the IPCC TAR Spaghetti Graph one of the critics of The Great Global Warming Swindle stated:
If a practising scientist selected a 1987 data set over more recent versions, failed to cite it correctly, altered the appearance of the data without a clear explanation and didn’t include the data from the last 20 years then I think we’d all be asking serious questions about their professionalism.
The irony of the statement was not lost on McIntyre who has spent the last three years attempting to gain the data upon which a lot of major climate science is based and is asking questions about why recent data is not being included in current publications.

In the context of putting data into the public domain, it is actually the required standard for any science published in any of the major scientific journals. Unfortunately, a number of these journals including Science, Nature and New Scientist are on the global warming bandwagon and do not only not enforce their own published standards on the requirement for scientists to provide their data but also actively interfere with attempts from those scientists in the 'denier' camp to access any data and subject it to further scrutiny.

If you want to get a full understanding that the science is not only nowhere near settled but also that the science is actually mumbo jumbo then ClimateAudit is a good place to visit from time to time. If you want to get your comments censored then go over to Realclimate and make a comment that climate models are wildly inaccurate. Then again, it is run by the Hockey Stick Team and facts are quite inconvenient to their case.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Yet in case you are entirely mindful and will effortlessly identify virtually any fraudulence, next you will have a straightforward select an individual. However, you are usually acquiring the particular rado replica yet it will always be a good idea to search cautiously about world wide web. Always method a dependable dealer. A web site gives an individual the particular confidence as well as the warrantee should become desired. When you want to obtain a look-alike of one's many popular brand name next almost all you should do is always to pick the Look-alike maker together with highest attention and also extreme care, rolex replica sale will be important which you take into account specific crucial variables within your assortment method to get the finest copy wrist watch maker. Pick a copy rolex replica sale maker who's the most effective Europe brand names. Pick anyone who has hublot replica uk support inside manifestation an individual almost everything which you have at any time wanted from the international brand name. Specifically when you need to get Amatory timepieces, rolex replica sale and also Vertu look-alike.

Unknown said...

20160920qiujie
louboutin pas cher
ugg boots clearance
louis vuitton outlet online
ed hardy outlet
cheap jordans for sale
ugg boots sale
coach factory outlet online
fake rolex watches
air max outlet
burberry outlet online

kkk said...

coach factory outlet
nike store
warriors jerseys
longchamp handbags
celine handbags
true religion jeans
adidas nmd runner
true religion outlet online
coach factory outlet
adidas nmd r1
170627yueqin